Were these Star Trek terms taken from science or made up for the show?
Are they science fiction or science fact?
CBS Television Distribution
Star Trek has had a profound affect not just on science fiction but on real science as well. The original series inspired a generation of people to become scientists and inventors. Even certain elements of the series have now become reality.
Part of Gene Roddenberry’s genius was weaving real scientific theories and terms with fictional technologies. This combination makes the world of the show feel real but also fun and interesting.
Can you guess which of the following terms are taken from science and which were completely made up just for the show?
-
Event horizon
-
Stardate
-
Antimatter
-
Holodeck
-
Pon farr
-
Iridium
-
Dilithium
-
Ion propulsion
-
Delta rays
-
Xenopolycythemia
-
Baryon
-
Scalosian water
-
Protoplasm
-
Tetralubisol
-
Gravimetric
-
Tachyon
-
Quadrotriticale
Were these Star Trek terms taken from science or made up for the show?
Your Result...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque nec ante ipsum. Mauris viverra, urna et porta sagittis, lorem diam dapibus diam, et lacinia libero quam id risus.Star Trek - Command Uniform
$19.95
Star Trek - Science Uniform
$19.95
Star Trek - Distressed TNG
$19.95
Star Trek - Command Uniform
$19.95
Star Trek - Science Uniform
$24.95
Star Trek - NCC1701
$19.95
91 Comments
17/17 - have to admit I am no expert on "Star Trek" and haven't taken a science class in 40 years, so not really sure how that perfect score happened. Logic dictates that it should never have occurred
You got 15 out of 17
Great job!
Missed #5 and #16.
I claim 16 out of 17.
If I write of something that never occurred, it's called fiction.
This ". . .a hypothetical particle that can travel faster than light. The term is used by scientists but no such particle is known to actually exist." qualifies as fiction.
Great job!
Missed #5 and #16.
I claim 16 out of 17.
If I write of something that never occurred, it's called fiction.
This ". . .a hypothetical particle that can travel faster than light. The term is used by scientists but no such particle is known to actually exist." qualifies as fiction.
Let ME ask y'all one. Is this a real term or something I'm making up?
IRIDIUM FLARE.
IRIDIUM FLARE.
If Star Trek: Voyager taught us anything, it's that you can solve any problem by sending a tachyon beam through the main deflector dish.
If it's hypothetical and not known to actually exist...doesn't that make it fictional?
So, using your logic, "The Wizard of Oz", "Clockwork Orange", "The Incredibles", "Babe", and Charlotte's Web" are all real. Even "Star Trek".
You cannot have it, both ways. No matter who is using what.
You cannot have it, both ways. No matter who is using what.
17. There was a "Making of The Trouble with Tribbles" episode book including David Gerrold, the writer. I thought triticale was a real grain. Of course they added Quadro.
2. How can stardate not be a real word.
2. How can stardate not be a real word.