Do you prefer these classic horror movies or their modern remakes?
Which movie are you most likely to watch this October?
Compass International Pictures/Universal Pictures
Is new truly always better than old? We're putting that theory to the test in this survey! We'll give you two films: a classic horror movie, and its modern successor, be it a reboot, remake, or sequel. You have to decide which film is the better of the two!
-
The Hills Have Eyes (1977) versus The Hills Have Eyes (2006)
-
-
Friday the 13th (1980) versus Friday the 13th (2009)
-
-
Child's Play (1988) versus Child's Play (2019)
-
-
Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1973) versus Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2022)
-
-
Halloween (1978) versus Halloween (2018)
-
-
The Invisible Man (1933) versus The Invisible Man (2020)
-
-
Dracula (1931) versus Dracula (1992)
-
-
The Evil Dead (1981) versus Evil Dead (2013)
-
-
The Exorcist (1973) versus The Exorcist: Believer (2023)
-
-
Scream (1996) versus Scream (2022)
-
Do you prefer these classic horror movies or their modern remakes?
Your Result...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque nec ante ipsum. Mauris viverra, urna et porta sagittis, lorem diam dapibus diam, et lacinia libero quam id risus.Scooby Doo - Spooky Doo
$19.95
Garfield - Cat-o-Lantern
$19.95
The Goonies - Flag (Black)
$19.95
CHiPs - Baker and Ponch
$19.95
Popeye - Circles
$19.95
JAWS Playing Cards
$9.99
Svengoolie® T-Shirt
$19.95
I Love Lucy - Lucy Lines
$19.95
39 Comments
100% similar - although I never saw the majority of these films. This was a **dumb** quiz, because any fan of classic movies would give the originals top priority... 🙄
I prefer all the originals. Surprised you didn't have Godzilla (original) & the remake. I don't care for the way they are making Godzilla in these recent movies. The TOHO made Godzilla in those early 2000 movies was the best one. With the exception of the original.
All of the originals are BETTER! The only reboot I would consider watching is Coppola's version of Dracula!
With very few exceptions, the original is always better. Remakes are only produced to make money by capitalizing on the original. Sometimes a remake is so completely reimagined it does stand on its own merit. One example that comes to mind is The Thing (from another world) 1951, which has no relationship to the Kurt Russel "The Thing" other than the name, even though both were adapted from the same novella.
One exception to that rule is when movies transitioned from silent to "talkies", where remakes helped re-tell the stories with sound. Another exception is when a studio was unhappy with an original version and tried until they got it right... "The Maltese Falcon" with Bogart was the *third* version and the one that hit...
100% similar. The people have spoken. We hate your garbage remakes Hollywood. Of course, they will still be made as long as there is still a penny to be squeezed out of an idea.
💯% similar and Slam Dunk 👏 --𝖄𝖔𝖚𝖗 𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖑 𝖎𝖘 𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖌, 𝖁𝖆𝖓 𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖘𝖎𝖓𝖌. - 𝕸𝖔𝖗𝖊 𝖜𝖔𝖑𝖋𝖘𝖇𝖆𝖓𝖊?